READERS on Writers
I READ
OR, "I JUST HAD TO WRITE"
Response to ONE's presentation of the "Pen Pal issue" in September 1959, was so immediate and vigorous that it became quickly apparent that what the readers were writing on the subject had to be enjoyed by all, and another in the series of "Readers on Writers' was in order.
Although both editors, Pedersen and Lambert, triggered a conflict, the preponderance of opposition fell upon Lambert.
Despite the majority of wishes expressed in the next few pages ONE's attorney still advises against a Pen Pal club under the auspices of our Organization at the present time.
"with... 'object: matrimony' . . ." Pedersen.
Messrs. L. H. and J. J. of New York write: After reading "I Want a Pen Pal," one of the outstanding articles in the September issue of ONE, I just had to write.
Some years ago while in high school, my English class entered the students' names, addresses, hobbies, etc. in a Pen Pal Club magazine. My pal was a boy my age in Illinois; I was from Atlanta. After corresponding for a year or more we felt we knew each other personally. I had not been brought out but felt I knew something of the gay set. Finally, after learning more, I sensed something in his letters: it was gradually revealed we were "brothers."
After graduation and many conversations via telephone, we decided to meet in Chicago and try a life of our own. We met, got jobs and found each other "nice to come home to"; that was five years ago. Since then, we have moved to New York, taken courses at a university, have jobs with a future, a beautiful apartment, and are very much attached to each other. We have our fights, but things always work out. Please wish us much luck and many more happy years together.
"the personality expressed in letters is generally more honest, and certainly more lasting." Pedersen.
Mr. D. N. of Indianapolis writes: I am against the idea of Pen Pals. Long distance love is never very satisfactory. Personal contacts are much more to be desired. A smile, ripple of laughter, a rambling conversation can never be captured in the abstraction of pen and paper. Also the written word can paint a glowing picture that can be later disappointing. I am against the idea-for myself.
5